Finally la tengo: mi foto de la Luna...
Y yo que pensaba que para este tipo de fotos hacía falta unos equipos astronómicos de esos que cuestan un ojo... Pues no, se puede fotografiar la Luna con una digital de gama media con 10 aumentos. Impresionante los resultados. Después de una horita tirando muchas fotos sin ningún resultado más que un punto de luz blanca, que podría ser un bombillo del mando a distancia, tuve que dejarlo por imposible y dedicarme a fotografiarla tras las nubes (el efecto no es malo tampoco) y para desquitarme tuve que tirarle una foto a la lámpara de noche de mi hermana. Al menos esa noche no me quedé sin foto de la Luna.
Pero Fortunately, the man invented the Internet, search engines and forums and I fell on my error. It turns out that even a cerradísima night, the moon is extremely bright. The digital automatic readings of little help in this case. The trick is to use a high shutter speed. This particular one was taken at 1 / 800 and f4.0 if I remember correctly. Although I tried various speeds and aperture openings, this one I show is the sharpest. Another little trick is to use the lowest ISO the camera, to avoid noise. The tripod is essential, of course. While the shutter speed is high, with the zoom all the way and posturita, it is almost impossible not to lose the frame (10X optical and 4X digital, although the latter you can save and cut it into an editing program, the result will be the same or even better, if you can use it I guess, according to experts) Well here's the photo. The merit is not mine, because the photos may be of most repeated in the history of photography, and also had to investigate the parameters in a forum ( www.quesabesde.com , highly recommended), but as it cost me yours, leave it here for anyone who has the curious are encouraged to go to the terrace.
0 comments:
Post a Comment